Will Biden also accept Chinese IP theft?

The Wall Street Journal published a story yesterday on Chinese courts declaring their firms can’t be sued anywhere in the world for theft of intellectual property and in two cases threatening fines of $1 million per week if suits go forward. The US government is aware but has done nothing. This is just one, recent event in decades of intellectual property (IP) theft and coercion by China and utter American failure to respond.

The US started protracted negotiations with China over IP
in 1986. In March 2021, the IP Commission confirmed that theft costs America hundreds of
billions of dollars annually and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the
biggest culprit. It seems those original talks didn’t work. In 1995, the
Clinton administration brokered an IP truce to avoid a $1 billion exchange of
sanctions. Threaten $1 billion, then get to steal tens of billions annually —
who says Beijing doesn’t know a good investment when it sees it?

In 2006, the Bush administration initiated the Strategic Economic Dialogue. To be fair, it gave a pass to
all sorts of harmful Chinese behavior, IP was only one part. In 2015, the Obama administration agreed
with Xi Jinping to halt cyber-enabled IP theft. Months later, the Ministry of
State Security initiated the Cloud Hopper campaign attacking American and other
companies.

Thirty years of abysmal American policies very briefly
looked to be ending when the Trump administration launched a Section 301 inquiry into Chinese IP coercion. Almost
immediately after the decision was made, though, President Trump decided it justified
across-the-board tariffs. Across-the-board tariffs don’t identify bad IP actors
and, therefore, can’t discourage IP coercion.

Donald Trump prepares to sign a memorandum on intellectual property tariffs on high-tech goods from China, March 22, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

The bookend Trump administration IP failure came in 2020,
with the “phase one
trade deal. It has no status in American law and thus no true enforcement
mechanism. Shockingly, Beijing didn’t meet its 2020 import commitments, and the US did
nothing. Phase one also had an IP component. There the US didn’t bother to
check if the PRC had gone beyond publishing new rules, when it had ignored
published rules for 35 years.

The recent decisions by Chinese courts display open contempt
for American policy. One firm specifically protected is Huawei, which faces
federal charges of racketeering and trade secret theft and is supposedly
the top China priority for many Members of Congress. Want to file an IP lawsuit against
what the US considers a criminal entity? Beijing punishes you. Washington
pretends China’s IP behavior is better.

Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump — bipartisanship
has been alive and well on this issue. Now the Biden administration. It’s off
to a familiar start by seeming to retain the Trump phase one deal but doing
nothing to enforce IP provisions, nor engaging in any other meaningful IP
enforcement.

It’s true that new China policies are expected shortly. But given Joe Biden’s previous inability to see either the PRC or Xi Jinping clearly, it’s hard to imagine the new policies will have any teeth. Given our track record back to 1986, it’s almost impossible to imagine they will have IP teeth. More likely tens of billions of dollars’ worth of knowledge will continue to be lost to China, while Democrats and Republicans alike express empty outrage.

The post Will Biden also accept Chinese IP theft? appeared first on American Enterprise Institute – AEI.